Colombia vs Ghana: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Colombia
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 227,393 t against 223,415 t in Colombia, a difference of 3,978 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 31st and Ghana ranks 29th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 6 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 72,286 t | 38,500 t | 33,786 t | Colombia |
| 1970s | 104,375 t | 41,528 t | 62,848 t | Colombia |
| 1980s | 131,115 t | 39,095 t | 92,020 t | Colombia |
| 1990s | 158,205 t | 67,753 t | 90,451 t | Colombia |
| 2000s | 178,797 t | 113,620 t | 65,177 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 200,262 t | 177,032 t | 23,230 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 218,807 t | 224,859 t | 6,052 t | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Colombia or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 227,393 t against 223,415 t in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Colombia and Ghana?
- 3,978 t, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Ghana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Ghana rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Colombia ranks 31st and Ghana ranks 29th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).