Comoros vs Guadeloupe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Comoros
- Guadeloupe
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 1,953 t against 1,754 t in Guadeloupe, a difference of 199 t.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Guadeloupe's.
Across all 46 years both countries report, Guadeloupe has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 158th and Guadeloupe ranks 161st of 201 countries.
Guadeloupe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Guadeloupe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 804.42 t | 4,072 t | 3,268 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 902.01 t | 3,226 t | 2,324 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 972.48 t | 2,420 t | 1,447 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1990s | 1,243 t | 1,985 t | 742.33 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 1,287 t | 2,066 t | 778.41 t | Guadeloupe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Comoros or Guadeloupe?
- Comoros, at 1,953 t against 1,754 t in Guadeloupe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Comoros and Guadeloupe?
- 199 t, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Guadeloupe?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
- How do Comoros and Guadeloupe rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Comoros ranks 158th and Guadeloupe ranks 161st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).