Côte d'Ivoire vs Uzbekistan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 243,723 t against 224,844 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 18,879 t.
That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 29 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 102,539 t | 150,178 t | 47,639 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 125,522 t | 159,462 t | 33,940 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 172,661 t | 188,125 t | 15,465 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 233,397 t | 210,824 t | 22,573 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Côte d'Ivoire or Uzbekistan?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 243,723 t against 224,844 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Côte d'Ivoire and Uzbekistan?
- 18,879 t, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Uzbekistan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).