Croatia vs Finland: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Croatia
- Finland
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 22,969 t against 21,609 t in Finland, a difference of 1,360 t.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Finland ahead.
Croatia ranks 103rd and Finland ranks 104th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Finland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24,165 t | 26,607 t | 2,442 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 27,959 t | 29,319 t | 1,360 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 30,644 t | 25,254 t | 5,390 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 29,233 t | 22,719 t | 6,514 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Croatia or Finland?
- Croatia, at 22,969 t against 21,609 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Croatia and Finland?
- 1,360 t, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Finland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Finland rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Croatia ranks 103rd and Finland ranks 104th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).