Cuba vs Lithuania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Cuba
- Lithuania
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 45,244 t against 42,943 t in Lithuania, a difference of 2,301 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 95th and Lithuania ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 79,108 t | 27,288 t | 51,821 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 76,270 t | 25,933 t | 50,337 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 75,584 t | 35,670 t | 39,913 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 50,000 t | 43,487 t | 6,513 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Cuba or Lithuania?
- Cuba, at 45,244 t against 42,943 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Cuba and Lithuania?
- 2,301 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Lithuania rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Cuba ranks 95th and Lithuania ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).