Czechia vs Guinea: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechia
- Guinea
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 69,889 t against 64,787 t in Guinea, a difference of 5,102 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 64th and Guinea ranks 67th of 186 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66,759 t | 22,477 t | 44,282 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 63,789 t | 28,867 t | 34,922 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 67,407 t | 39,600 t | 27,807 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 70,438 t | 59,867 t | 10,572 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Czechia or Guinea?
- Czechia, at 69,889 t against 64,787 t in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Czechia and Guinea?
- 5,102 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Guinea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Guinea rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Czechia ranks 64th and Guinea ranks 67th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).