Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Melanesia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
52,739 t
in 2023
Melanesia
64,114 t
in 2023
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
15th
Melanesia rank
12th

Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Melanesia
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports 64,114 t against 52,739 t in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 11,375 t.

That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.2 times Democratic People's Republic of Korea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic People's Republic of Korea ahead.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 15th and Melanesia ranks 12th of 18 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Democratic People's Republic of Korea averaged higher in 6 and Melanesia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea Melanesia Difference Ahead
1960s 30,225 t 21,855 t 8,370 t Democratic People's Republic of Korea
1970s 40,765 t 26,573 t 14,192 t Democratic People's Republic of Korea
1980s 55,172 t 34,236 t 20,937 t Democratic People's Republic of Korea
1990s 57,534 t 39,469 t 18,065 t Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2000s 59,376 t 45,904 t 13,472 t Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2010s 58,926 t 56,948 t 1,978 t Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2020s 54,012 t 61,397 t 7,384 t Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or Melanesia?
Melanesia, at 64,114 t against 52,739 t in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Melanesia?
11,375 t, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Melanesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Melanesia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 15th and Melanesia ranks 12th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Melanesia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/melanesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/melanesia/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Melanesia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).