Djibouti vs Maldives: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Djibouti
- Maldives
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 316.39 t against 187.58 t in Maldives, a difference of 128.81 t.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.7 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Maldives ahead.
Djibouti ranks 168th and Maldives ranks 171st of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.71 t | 118.63 t | 114.92 t | Maldives |
| 1970s | 7 t | 136.61 t | 129.6 t | Maldives |
| 1980s | 53.69 t | 182 t | 128.31 t | Maldives |
| 1990s | 101.07 t | 164.81 t | 63.74 t | Maldives |
| 2000s | 115.22 t | 288.01 t | 172.79 t | Maldives |
| 2010s | 182.74 t | 264.74 t | 82 t | Maldives |
| 2020s | 322.57 t | 233.52 t | 89.04 t | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Djibouti or Maldives?
- Djibouti, at 316.39 t against 187.58 t in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Djibouti and Maldives?
- 128.81 t, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Maldives?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Maldives rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Djibouti ranks 168th and Maldives ranks 171st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).