Dominica vs Qatar: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Dominica
- Qatar
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 546.79 t against 447.8 t in Qatar, a difference of 98.99 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.2 times Qatar's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 164th and Qatar ranks 166th of 186 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 545.08 t | 40.1 t | 504.98 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 563.44 t | 37.76 t | 525.68 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 678.84 t | 77.93 t | 600.92 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 729.96 t | 180.35 t | 549.61 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 504.9 t | 177.93 t | 326.97 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 520.55 t | 218.37 t | 302.18 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 541.74 t | 377.27 t | 164.46 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Dominica or Qatar?
- Dominica, at 546.79 t against 447.8 t in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Dominica and Qatar?
- 98.99 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Qatar rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Dominica ranks 164th and Qatar ranks 166th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).