Dominican Republic vs Ethiopia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Dominican Republic
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 279,354 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 9,372 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 24th and Ethiopia ranks 25th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36,195 t | 69,582 t | 33,387 t | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 81,745 t | 112,922 t | 31,177 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 143,310 t | 222,662 t | 79,352 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 229,885 t | 264,383 t | 34,498 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Dominican Republic or Ethiopia?
- Dominican Republic, at 279,354 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Dominican Republic and Ethiopia?
- 9,372 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Ethiopia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Dominican Republic ranks 24th and Ethiopia ranks 25th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).