Ecuador vs Guatemala: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Ecuador
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 136,040 t against 120,544 t in Ecuador, a difference of 15,496 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 45th and Guatemala ranks 43rd of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 57,832 t | 18,318 t | 39,514 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 52,231 t | 29,554 t | 22,678 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 52,581 t | 33,321 t | 19,260 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 79,552 t | 49,235 t | 30,317 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 97,019 t | 75,439 t | 21,580 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 114,361 t | 120,344 t | 5,983 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 118,172 t | 134,531 t | 16,360 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Ecuador or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 136,040 t against 120,544 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Ecuador and Guatemala?
- 15,496 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guatemala?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Guatemala rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Ecuador ranks 45th and Guatemala ranks 43rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).