Eritrea vs United Arab Emirates: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 2,730 t against 1,868 t in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 862 t.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.5 times United Arab Emirates's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Eritrea ranks 143rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 146th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,614 t | 3,298 t | 683.88 t | United Arab Emirates |
| 2000s | 2,430 t | 3,685 t | 1,254 t | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 2,673 t | 1,758 t | 914.84 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 2,725 t | 1,961 t | 764.5 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Eritrea or United Arab Emirates?
- Eritrea, at 2,730 t against 1,868 t in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Eritrea and United Arab Emirates?
- 862 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and United Arab Emirates?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and United Arab Emirates rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 143rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 146th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).