Ethiopia vs Northern Europe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Northern Europe
How they compare
Northern Europe currently reports 416,180 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 146,198 t.
That makes Northern Europe's figure about 1.5 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Northern Europe has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 25th and Northern Europe ranks 25th of 186 countries.
Northern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Northern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69,582 t | 442,547 t | 372,965 t | Northern Europe |
| 2000s | 112,922 t | 421,682 t | 308,760 t | Northern Europe |
| 2010s | 222,662 t | 434,752 t | 212,091 t | Northern Europe |
| 2020s | 264,383 t | 437,387 t | 173,004 t | Northern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Northern Europe?
- Northern Europe, at 416,180 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Northern Europe?
- 146,198 t, with Northern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Northern Europe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Northern Europe rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 25th and Northern Europe ranks 25th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).