Ethiopia vs Southern Europe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Southern Europe
How they compare
Southern Europe currently reports 656,491 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 386,509 t.
That makes Southern Europe's figure about 2.4 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Southern Europe has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 25th and Southern Europe ranks 23rd of 186 countries.
Southern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Southern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69,582 t | 863,955 t | 794,373 t | Southern Europe |
| 2000s | 112,922 t | 858,334 t | 745,412 t | Southern Europe |
| 2010s | 222,662 t | 803,589 t | 580,927 t | Southern Europe |
| 2020s | 264,383 t | 759,095 t | 494,712 t | Southern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Southern Europe?
- Southern Europe, at 656,491 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Southern Europe?
- 386,509 t, with Southern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Southern Europe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Southern Europe rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 25th and Southern Europe ranks 23rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).