Ethiopia vs Spain: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Spain
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 269,982 t against 229,786 t in Spain, a difference of 40,196 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Spain's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Spain ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 25th and Spain ranks 27th of 186 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69,582 t | 278,725 t | 209,143 t | Spain |
| 2000s | 112,922 t | 301,263 t | 188,341 t | Spain |
| 2010s | 222,662 t | 301,504 t | 78,843 t | Spain |
| 2020s | 264,383 t | 296,855 t | 32,472 t | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Spain?
- Ethiopia, at 269,982 t against 229,786 t in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Spain?
- 40,196 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Spain?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Spain rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 25th and Spain ranks 27th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).