Finland vs Kyrgyzstan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Finland
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 26,249 t against 21,609 t in Finland, a difference of 4,640 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 104th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 100th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,607 t | 16,313 t | 10,294 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 29,319 t | 24,238 t | 5,082 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 25,254 t | 25,519 t | 264.47 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 22,719 t | 26,267 t | 3,548 t | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Finland or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 26,249 t against 21,609 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Finland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 4,640 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Finland ranks 104th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 100th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).