Germany vs Polynesia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Germany
- Polynesia
How they compare
Germany currently reports 447,658 t against 2,660 t in Polynesia, a difference of 444,998 t.
That makes Germany's figure about 168.3 times Polynesia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Germany ranks 19th and Polynesia ranks 17th of 186 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 400,447 t | 4,754 t | 395,693 t | Germany |
| 1970s | 408,259 t | 4,830 t | 403,429 t | Germany |
| 1980s | 430,027 t | 4,327 t | 425,700 t | Germany |
| 1990s | 411,760 t | 3,122 t | 408,637 t | Germany |
| 2000s | 442,598 t | 3,310 t | 439,288 t | Germany |
| 2010s | 438,944 t | 3,128 t | 435,816 t | Germany |
| 2020s | 441,277 t | 2,651 t | 438,625 t | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Germany or Polynesia?
- Germany, at 447,658 t against 2,660 t in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Germany and Polynesia?
- 444,998 t, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Polynesia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Germany ranks 19th and Polynesia ranks 17th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).