Grenada vs Malta: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Grenada
- Malta
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 184.14 t against 169.84 t in Malta, a difference of 14.3 t.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 187th and Malta ranks 188th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 4 and Malta in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 444.18 t | 312.44 t | 131.74 t | Grenada |
| 1970s | 406.78 t | 309.38 t | 97.41 t | Grenada |
| 1980s | 361.83 t | 329.38 t | 32.45 t | Grenada |
| 1990s | 304.56 t | 447.02 t | 142.46 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 193.58 t | 450.22 t | 256.64 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 240.65 t | 370.16 t | 129.5 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 200.81 t | 179.28 t | 21.53 t | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Grenada or Malta?
- Grenada, at 184.14 t against 169.84 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Grenada and Malta?
- 14.3 t, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Malta rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Grenada ranks 187th and Malta ranks 188th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).