Guadeloupe vs Lesotho: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Guadeloupe
- Lesotho
How they compare
Guadeloupe currently reports 1,754 t against 1,526 t in Lesotho, a difference of 228 t.
That makes Guadeloupe's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
Across all 46 years both countries report, Guadeloupe has been ahead every year.
Guadeloupe ranks 148th and Lesotho ranks 149th of 185 countries.
Guadeloupe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guadeloupe | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,072 t | 1,100 t | 2,972 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 3,226 t | 1,124 t | 2,102 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 2,420 t | 1,020 t | 1,400 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1990s | 1,985 t | 1,270 t | 714.96 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 2,066 t | 1,306 t | 759.42 t | Guadeloupe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Guadeloupe or Lesotho?
- Guadeloupe, at 1,754 t against 1,526 t in Lesotho as of 2006.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Guadeloupe and Lesotho?
- 228 t, with Guadeloupe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guadeloupe and Lesotho?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
- How do Guadeloupe and Lesotho rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Guadeloupe ranks 148th and Lesotho ranks 149th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).