Guyana vs Sierra Leone: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Guyana
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 19,439 t against 18,680 t in Guyana, a difference of 759 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 108th and Sierra Leone ranks 106th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 4 and Sierra Leone in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,281 t | 4,393 t | 1,888 t | Guyana |
| 1970s | 6,649 t | 5,022 t | 1,627 t | Guyana |
| 1980s | 6,161 t | 6,013 t | 147.67 t | Guyana |
| 1990s | 6,437 t | 6,403 t | 33.39 t | Guyana |
| 2000s | 6,914 t | 11,066 t | 4,153 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 12,105 t | 18,783 t | 6,678 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 17,815 t | 19,309 t | 1,494 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Guyana or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 19,439 t against 18,680 t in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Guyana and Sierra Leone?
- 759 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Sierra Leone rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Guyana ranks 108th and Sierra Leone ranks 106th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).