Honduras vs Lithuania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Honduras
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 42,943 t against 38,000 t in Honduras, a difference of 4,943 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 100th and Lithuania ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23,271 t | 27,288 t | 4,016 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 29,131 t | 25,933 t | 3,198 t | Honduras |
| 2010s | 37,753 t | 35,670 t | 2,083 t | Honduras |
| 2020s | 37,599 t | 43,487 t | 5,888 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Honduras or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 42,943 t against 38,000 t in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Honduras and Lithuania?
- 4,943 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Lithuania rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Honduras ranks 100th and Lithuania ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).