Hungary vs Japan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Hungary
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 117,073 t against 100,991 t in Hungary, a difference of 16,082 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 49th and Japan ranks 47th of 185 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 73,508 t | 205,172 t | 131,664 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 92,585 t | 169,506 t | 76,921 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 116,919 t | 168,529 t | 51,610 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 97,849 t | 152,904 t | 55,055 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 94,951 t | 139,711 t | 44,760 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 97,554 t | 125,195 t | 27,641 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 90,407 t | 120,232 t | 29,826 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Hungary or Japan?
- Japan, at 117,073 t against 100,991 t in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Hungary and Japan?
- 16,082 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Japan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Hungary ranks 49th and Japan ranks 47th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).