Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
251,286 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
227,059 t
in 2023
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th

Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time

  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iran (Islamic Republic of) currently reports 251,286 t against 227,059 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 24,227 t.

That makes Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s figure about 1.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iran (Islamic Republic of) has been ahead every year.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 18 countries.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran (Islamic Republic of) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 61,734 t 35,435 t 26,300 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
1970s 93,975 t 49,334 t 44,641 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
1980s 131,753 t 65,018 t 66,735 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
1990s 204,884 t 76,626 t 128,258 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2000s 251,268 t 118,106 t 133,163 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2010s 266,166 t 198,924 t 67,242 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2020s 253,704 t 219,496 t 34,208 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Iran (Islamic Republic of), at 251,286 t against 227,059 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
24,227 t, with Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium/iran-islamic-republic-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium/iran-islamic-republic-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).