Iraq vs Slovakia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Iraq
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 34,136 t against 33,361 t in Iraq, a difference of 775 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 95th and Slovakia ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,760 t | 29,787 t | 973.91 t | Iraq |
| 2000s | 32,154 t | 26,458 t | 5,697 t | Iraq |
| 2010s | 35,378 t | 28,792 t | 6,585 t | Iraq |
| 2020s | 40,408 t | 32,277 t | 8,131 t | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Iraq or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 34,136 t against 33,361 t in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Iraq and Slovakia?
- 775 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Slovakia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Iraq ranks 95th and Slovakia ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).