Ireland vs Israel: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Ireland
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 15,014 t against 14,238 t in Ireland, a difference of 776 t.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 114th and Israel ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20,740 t | 9,846 t | 10,894 t | Ireland |
| 1970s | 20,661 t | 15,946 t | 4,715 t | Ireland |
| 1980s | 21,791 t | 18,316 t | 3,475 t | Ireland |
| 1990s | 20,242 t | 15,542 t | 4,700 t | Ireland |
| 2000s | 18,439 t | 15,475 t | 2,964 t | Ireland |
| 2010s | 16,130 t | 15,632 t | 498.07 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 15,493 t | 14,929 t | 564.2 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Ireland or Israel?
- Israel, at 15,014 t against 14,238 t in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Ireland and Israel?
- 776 t, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Israel?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and Israel rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Ireland ranks 114th and Israel ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).