Jordan vs North Macedonia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Jordan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 8,821 t against 8,186 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 635 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Jordan ranks 123rd and North Macedonia ranks 125th of 186 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,296 t | 8,372 t | 4,076 t | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 5,972 t | 8,435 t | 2,463 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 8,077 t | 9,208 t | 1,131 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 8,267 t | 9,166 t | 898.97 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Jordan or North Macedonia?
- Jordan, at 8,821 t against 8,186 t in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Jordan and North Macedonia?
- 635 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and North Macedonia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Jordan ranks 123rd and North Macedonia ranks 125th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).