Kazakhstan, Republic of vs Malawi: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Kazakhstan, Republic of
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 163,866 t against 158,214 t in Kazakhstan, Republic of, a difference of 5,652 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan, Republic of ahead.
Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 38th and Malawi ranks 37th of 185 countries.
Kazakhstan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan, Republic of | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 98,909 t | 32,273 t | 66,637 t | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
| 2000s | 113,388 t | 56,907 t | 56,480 t | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
| 2010s | 156,839 t | 110,637 t | 46,202 t | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
| 2020s | 173,076 t | 157,825 t | 15,250 t | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Kazakhstan, Republic of or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 163,866 t against 158,214 t in Kazakhstan, Republic of as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Kazakhstan, Republic of and Malawi?
- 5,652 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan, Republic of and Malawi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan, Republic of and Malawi rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 38th and Malawi ranks 37th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).