Kenya vs Yugoslav SFR: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Kenya
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 166,741 t against 153,090 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 13,651 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 36th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 39th of 185 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27,534 t | 104,028 t | 76,494 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 38,455 t | 122,635 t | 84,180 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 52,925 t | 139,046 t | 86,122 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 68,855 t | 139,133 t | 70,278 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Kenya or Yugoslav SFR?
- Kenya, at 166,741 t against 153,090 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Kenya and Yugoslav SFR?
- 13,651 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Kenya and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Kenya ranks 36th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 39th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).