Kiribati vs Samoa: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Kiribati
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 1,235 t against 1,216 t in Kiribati, a difference of 19 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.
Kiribati ranks 166th and Samoa ranks 165th of 201 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 414.74 t | 2,436 t | 2,021 t | Samoa |
| 1970s | 452.05 t | 2,746 t | 2,294 t | Samoa |
| 1980s | 622.09 t | 2,653 t | 2,031 t | Samoa |
| 1990s | 581.99 t | 1,696 t | 1,114 t | Samoa |
| 2000s | 839.36 t | 1,775 t | 936.05 t | Samoa |
| 2010s | 1,193 t | 1,571 t | 378.55 t | Samoa |
| 2020s | 1,159 t | 1,236 t | 77.07 t | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Kiribati or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 1,235 t against 1,216 t in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Kiribati and Samoa?
- 19 t, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Kiribati ranks 166th and Samoa ranks 165th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).