Kuwait vs Suriname: Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Kuwait
- Suriname
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 1,198 t against 1,019 t in Suriname, a difference of 179 t.
That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.
Kuwait ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 170th of 201 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17.55 t | 874.79 t | 857.24 t | Suriname |
| 1970s | 62.61 t | 1,217 t | 1,154 t | Suriname |
| 1980s | 200.5 t | 1,608 t | 1,408 t | Suriname |
| 1990s | 345.21 t | 1,475 t | 1,130 t | Suriname |
| 2000s | 904.29 t | 1,356 t | 451.25 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 1,474 t | 1,916 t | 442.92 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 1,120 t | 1,153 t | 33.03 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal β cropland potassium, Kuwait or Suriname?
- Kuwait, at 1,198 t against 1,019 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal β cropland potassium between Kuwait and Suriname?
- 179 t, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Suriname rank globally for crop harvest removal β cropland potassium?
- Kuwait ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 170th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).