Lao People's Democratic Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium

Lao People's Democratic Republic
68,720 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
227,059 t
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
11th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th

Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 227,059 t against 68,720 t in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 158,339 t.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 3.3 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 18 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 3,945 t 35,435 t 31,490 t United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 5,158 t 49,334 t 44,176 t United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 6,967 t 65,018 t 58,051 t United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 9,575 t 76,626 t 67,052 t United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 17,634 t 118,106 t 100,471 t United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 46,622 t 198,924 t 152,302 t United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 61,713 t 219,496 t 157,783 t United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Lao People's Democratic Republic or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 227,059 t against 68,720 t in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Lao People's Democratic Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
158,339 t, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).