Liberia vs Norway: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Liberia
- Norway
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 7,490 t against 6,612 t in Norway, a difference of 878 t.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.
Liberia ranks 128th and Norway ranks 130th of 186 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,085 t | 10,096 t | 7,011 t | Norway |
| 1970s | 4,017 t | 9,770 t | 5,754 t | Norway |
| 1980s | 4,622 t | 10,133 t | 5,511 t | Norway |
| 1990s | 3,875 t | 9,923 t | 6,049 t | Norway |
| 2000s | 5,561 t | 9,249 t | 3,688 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 6,634 t | 8,509 t | 1,874 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 7,456 t | 8,736 t | 1,280 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Liberia or Norway?
- Liberia, at 7,490 t against 6,612 t in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Liberia and Norway?
- 878 t, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Norway rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Liberia ranks 128th and Norway ranks 130th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).