Luxembourg vs Sao Tome and Principe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Luxembourg
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 916.28 t against 596.12 t in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 320.16 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.5 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 158th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 161st of 186 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,155 t | 695.01 t | 459.54 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1,041 t | 657.86 t | 383.43 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 947.04 t | 566.46 t | 380.57 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Luxembourg or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Luxembourg, at 916.28 t against 596.12 t in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Luxembourg and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 320.16 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Luxembourg ranks 158th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 161st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).