Luxembourg vs Tonga: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Luxembourg
- Tonga
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 916.28 t against 650.48 t in Tonga, a difference of 265.8 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.4 times Tonga's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 158th and Tonga ranks 159th of 185 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,155 t | 739.23 t | 415.31 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1,041 t | 814.98 t | 226.31 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 947.04 t | 636.47 t | 310.57 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Luxembourg or Tonga?
- Luxembourg, at 916.28 t against 650.48 t in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Luxembourg and Tonga?
- 265.8 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Tonga?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Tonga rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Luxembourg ranks 158th and Tonga ranks 159th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).