Malawi vs Peru: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Malawi
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 168,847 t against 163,866 t in Malawi, a difference of 4,981 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 43rd and Peru ranks 41st of 201 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,995 t | 52,441 t | 41,446 t | Peru |
| 1970s | 16,867 t | 58,264 t | 41,396 t | Peru |
| 1980s | 21,642 t | 58,782 t | 37,140 t | Peru |
| 1990s | 31,049 t | 73,387 t | 42,338 t | Peru |
| 2000s | 56,907 t | 110,862 t | 53,954 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 110,637 t | 144,744 t | 34,107 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 157,825 t | 168,774 t | 10,950 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Malawi or Peru?
- Peru, at 168,847 t against 163,866 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Malawi and Peru?
- 4,981 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Peru rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Malawi ranks 43rd and Peru ranks 41st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).