Malaysia vs Mexico: Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Malaysia
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 604,841 t against 484,455 t in Malaysia, a difference of 120,386 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.2 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.
Malaysia ranks 18th and Mexico ranks 15th of 185 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25,523 t | 204,615 t | 179,092 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 57,355 t | 262,396 t | 205,041 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 134,914 t | 351,179 t | 216,265 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 236,382 t | 377,087 t | 140,706 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 378,764 t | 464,323 t | 85,558 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 484,906 t | 535,608 t | 50,703 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 485,961 t | 604,958 t | 118,997 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal β cropland potassium, Malaysia or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 604,841 t against 484,455 t in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal β cropland potassium between Malaysia and Mexico?
- 120,386 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Mexico rank globally for crop harvest removal β cropland potassium?
- Malaysia ranks 18th and Mexico ranks 15th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).