Mauritius vs Mongolia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Mauritius
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 4,224 t against 4,143 t in Mauritius, a difference of 81 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 149th and Mongolia ranks 148th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,709 t | 1,417 t | 6,292 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 8,520 t | 1,971 t | 6,549 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 8,224 t | 3,900 t | 4,324 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 8,150 t | 2,241 t | 5,909 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 7,492 t | 1,571 t | 5,922 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 5,965 t | 3,383 t | 2,583 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 4,074 t | 4,231 t | 156.83 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Mauritius or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 4,224 t against 4,143 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Mauritius and Mongolia?
- 81 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Mongolia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Mongolia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Mauritius ranks 149th and Mongolia ranks 148th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).