Niger vs Serbia, Republic of: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Niger
- Serbia, Republic of
How they compare
Niger currently reports 92,942 t against 82,871 t in Serbia, Republic of, a difference of 10,071 t.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.1 times Serbia, Republic of's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia, Republic of ahead.
Niger ranks 56th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 59th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 1 and Serbia, Republic of in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Serbia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46,008 t | 71,756 t | 25,747 t | Serbia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 71,100 t | 76,562 t | 5,462 t | Serbia, Republic of |
| 2020s | 88,893 t | 79,998 t | 8,895 t | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Niger or Serbia, Republic of?
- Niger, at 92,942 t against 82,871 t in Serbia, Republic of as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Niger and Serbia, Republic of?
- 10,071 t, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Serbia, Republic of?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Niger and Serbia, Republic of rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Niger ranks 56th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 59th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).