Nigeria vs Ukraine: Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Nigeria
- Ukraine
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 1.04 million t against 669,062 t in Ukraine, a difference of 372,848 t.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.6 times Ukraine's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Nigeria ranks 8th and Ukraine ranks 10th of 185 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 534,821 t | 400,528 t | 134,293 t | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 694,642 t | 421,018 t | 273,624 t | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 834,801 t | 639,910 t | 194,891 t | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 1.02 million t | 669,197 t | 352,483 t | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal β cropland potassium, Nigeria or Ukraine?
- Nigeria, at 1.04 million t against 669,062 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal β cropland potassium between Nigeria and Ukraine?
- 372,848 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Nigeria and Ukraine rank globally for crop harvest removal β cropland potassium?
- Nigeria ranks 8th and Ukraine ranks 10th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).