Saudi Arabia vs Togo: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 26,520 t against 23,784 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 2,736 t.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Togo ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 101st and Togo ranks 99th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 3 and Togo in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,043 t | 6,016 t | 2,973 t | Togo |
| 1970s | 3,629 t | 6,648 t | 3,018 t | Togo |
| 1980s | 13,436 t | 8,369 t | 5,067 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 25,347 t | 12,796 t | 12,551 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 22,538 t | 15,724 t | 6,814 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 17,228 t | 20,782 t | 3,554 t | Togo |
| 2020s | 23,015 t | 24,935 t | 1,919 t | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Saudi Arabia or Togo?
- Togo, at 26,520 t against 23,784 t in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Saudi Arabia and Togo?
- 2,736 t, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Togo rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 101st and Togo ranks 99th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).