Southern Africa vs Uzbekistan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Southern Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Southern Africa currently reports 228,173 t against 224,844 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 3,329 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Southern Africa ranks 28th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 29 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Southern Africa averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 127,514 t | 150,178 t | 22,664 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 147,676 t | 159,462 t | 11,786 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 172,332 t | 188,125 t | 15,793 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 215,618 t | 210,824 t | 4,794 t | Southern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Southern Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Southern Africa, at 228,173 t against 224,844 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Southern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 3,329 t, with Southern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Southern Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Southern Africa ranks 28th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).