Spain vs Uzbekistan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Spain
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Spain currently reports 229,786 t against 224,844 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 4,942 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Spain ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 186 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 277,292 t | 150,178 t | 127,114 t | Spain |
| 2000s | 301,263 t | 159,462 t | 141,801 t | Spain |
| 2010s | 301,504 t | 188,125 t | 113,379 t | Spain |
| 2020s | 296,855 t | 210,824 t | 86,032 t | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Spain or Uzbekistan?
- Spain, at 229,786 t against 224,844 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Spain and Uzbekistan?
- 4,942 t, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Spain and Uzbekistan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Spain ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).