Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Central African Republic
3.06 kg/ha
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
2.91 kg/ha
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
152nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
155th

Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Equatorial Guinea
0123196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 3.06 kg/ha against 2.91 kg/ha in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.15 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 152nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9238 kg/ha 0.3508 kg/ha 0.573 kg/ha Central African Republic
1970s 0.867 kg/ha 0.3505 kg/ha 0.5165 kg/ha Central African Republic
1980s 1.22 kg/ha 0.3909 kg/ha 0.8297 kg/ha Central African Republic
1990s 1.14 kg/ha 0.9441 kg/ha 0.2001 kg/ha Central African Republic
2000s 1.2 kg/ha 1.73 kg/ha 0.5255 kg/ha Equatorial Guinea
2010s 2.12 kg/ha 2.72 kg/ha 0.6005 kg/ha Equatorial Guinea
2020s 2.62 kg/ha 2.92 kg/ha 0.2963 kg/ha Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Central African Republic or Equatorial Guinea?
Central African Republic, at 3.06 kg/ha against 2.91 kg/ha in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
0.15 kg/ha, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Central African Republic ranks 152nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/central-african-republic/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/central-african-republic/equatorial-guinea/">Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).