Comoros vs Estonia: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Comoros
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 4.81 kg/ha against 4.79 kg/ha in Comoros, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Comoros ranks 142nd and Estonia ranks 141st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.79 kg/ha | 4.54 kg/ha | 1.75 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 4.04 kg/ha | 2.8 kg/ha | 1.24 kg/ha | Comoros |
| 2010s | 4.45 kg/ha | 2.8 kg/ha | 1.66 kg/ha | Comoros |
| 2020s | 4.57 kg/ha | 5.07 kg/ha | 0.5048 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Comoros or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 4.81 kg/ha against 4.79 kg/ha in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Comoros and Estonia?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Estonia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Comoros ranks 142nd and Estonia ranks 141st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).