Comoros vs Haiti: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Comoros
- Haiti
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 4.79 kg/ha against 4.78 kg/ha in Haiti, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Comoros ranks 132nd and Haiti ranks 133rd of 185 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.19 kg/ha | 5.21 kg/ha | 2.02 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1970s | 3.35 kg/ha | 5.32 kg/ha | 1.98 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1980s | 3.29 kg/ha | 4.98 kg/ha | 1.69 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1990s | 2.82 kg/ha | 4.95 kg/ha | 2.13 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2000s | 4.04 kg/ha | 4.68 kg/ha | 0.6349 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2010s | 4.45 kg/ha | 4.63 kg/ha | 0.1745 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2020s | 4.57 kg/ha | 4.65 kg/ha | 0.0808 kg/ha | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Comoros or Haiti?
- Comoros, at 4.79 kg/ha against 4.78 kg/ha in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Comoros and Haiti?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Haiti?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Haiti rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Comoros ranks 132nd and Haiti ranks 133rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).