Croatia vs Saudi Arabia: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Croatia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 11.26 kg/ha against 10.79 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.47 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Croatia ranks 73rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 76th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.34 kg/ha | 12.28 kg/ha | 1.94 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 14.07 kg/ha | 12.82 kg/ha | 1.25 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2010s | 14.74 kg/ha | 11.93 kg/ha | 2.81 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2020s | 12.58 kg/ha | 10.01 kg/ha | 2.57 kg/ha | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Croatia or Saudi Arabia?
- Croatia, at 11.26 kg/ha against 10.79 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Croatia and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.47 kg/ha, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Croatia ranks 73rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 76th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).