Cuba vs Togo: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 8.01 kg/ha against 7.84 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 105th and Togo ranks 104th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.87 kg/ha | 3.75 kg/ha | 2.12 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 7.66 kg/ha | 5.47 kg/ha | 2.19 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 9 kg/ha | 4.63 kg/ha | 4.37 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 6.55 kg/ha | 5.49 kg/ha | 1.06 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 7.57 kg/ha | 6.89 kg/ha | 0.6882 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 8.86 kg/ha | 7.09 kg/ha | 1.77 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 7.6 kg/ha | 7.83 kg/ha | 0.2309 kg/ha | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cuba or Togo?
- Togo, at 8.01 kg/ha against 7.84 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cuba and Togo?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Togo rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 105th and Togo ranks 104th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).