Cyprus vs Ethiopia PDR: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cyprus
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 6.74 kg/ha against 6.69 kg/ha in Cyprus, a difference of 0.05 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Cyprus ranks 114th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.34 kg/ha | 4.13 kg/ha | 0.7915 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 3.43 kg/ha | 5.05 kg/ha | 1.62 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 5.52 kg/ha | 6.63 kg/ha | 1.11 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 6.31 kg/ha | 7.31 kg/ha | 0.9927 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cyprus or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 6.74 kg/ha against 6.69 kg/ha in Cyprus as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cyprus and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.05 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cyprus and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cyprus ranks 114th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).