Czechia vs Europe: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Europe
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 35.56 kg/ha against 23.26 kg/ha in Europe, a difference of 12.3 kg/ha.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.5 times Europe's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 7th and Europe ranks 4th of 186 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.78 kg/ha | 12.95 kg/ha | 13.83 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 25.6 kg/ha | 14.19 kg/ha | 11.41 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 29.53 kg/ha | 17.92 kg/ha | 11.62 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 34.68 kg/ha | 22.09 kg/ha | 12.59 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Czechia or Europe?
- Czechia, at 35.56 kg/ha against 23.26 kg/ha in Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Czechia and Europe?
- 12.3 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Europe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Europe rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 7th and Europe ranks 4th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).