Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
- Sudan
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports 2.91 kg/ha against 2.79 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 155th and Sudan ranks 157th of 185 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea, Republic of | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.77 kg/ha | 3.34 kg/ha | 0.5703 kg/ha | Sudan |
| 2020s | 2.92 kg/ha | 3.21 kg/ha | 0.2957 kg/ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Sudan?
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at 2.91 kg/ha against 2.79 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Sudan?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 155th and Sudan ranks 157th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).